Patterns of Retaliation and Asymmetrical Force

Via Marginal Revolution; an econometrics paper on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict hits the nail on the head: http://www.econ.uzh.ch/faculty/haushofer/Haushofer.PNAS2010.pdf

“Ending violent international conflicts requires understanding the causal factors that perpetuate them. In the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, Israelis and Palestinians each tend to see themselves as victims, engaging in violence only in response to attacks initiated by a fundamentally and implacably violent foe bent on their destruction. Econometric techniques allow us to empirically test the degree to which violence on each side occurs in response to aggression by the other side. Prior studies using these methods have argued that Israel reacts strongly to attacks by Palestinians, whereas Palestinian violence is random (i.e., not predicted by prior Israeli attacks). Here we replicate prior findings that Israeli killings of Palestinians increase after Palestinian killings of Israelis, but crucially show further that when nonlethal forms of violence are considered, and when a larger dataset is used, Palestinian violence also reveals a pattern of retaliation: (i) the firing of Palestinian rockets increases sharply after Israelis kill Palestinians, and (ii) the probability (although not the number) of killings of Israelis by Palestinians increases after killings of Palestinians by Israel. These findings suggest that Israeli military actions against Palestinians lead to escalation rather than incapacitation. Further, they refute the view that Palestinians are uncontingently violent, showing instead that a significant proportion of Palestinian violence occurs in response to Israeli behavior. Well-established cognitive biases may lead participants on each side of the conflict to underappreciate the degree to which the other side’s violence is retaliatory, and hence to systematically underestimate their own role in perpetuating the conflict.”

Not only does statistical analysis put the Israeli armed forces in the wrong; but they are facing an enemy that will fight with unrelenting enmity for Palestinians in Israel are without a state. With no statehood, no country of origin, their former lands are occupied by Israel, and at any point in time their homes and properties can be seized by Israel while they have no legal power to bring those unjust acts to proper justice. The problem of retaliation only magnifies how oppressive the Israeli government has been against Palestine. Israel’s Palestinian question cannot be solved by inflaming the peoples whose lands they occupy. And using asymmetrical force further drives home the cognitive dissonance in the Israeli government’s actions. It sends the wrong message to Israelis who are on the fence about a Palestinian nation and only amps up the fanatical right’s confirmation bias.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: